21st Century Cures Act: Medicare Advantage Impact

Review of Relevant Provisions with Expert Insight

March 2017

PULSE8 is privileged to bring you a summary of key Medicare Advantage program requirements within the 21st Century Cures Act. The bill was signed into law on December 13, 2016 by President Barrack Obama.

Key Medicare Advantage Requirement Update Announcements:
  • Issuance of Risk Adjustment Methodology Change Requirements (Expanded Detail Below)
  • Order for a Temporary (through 2018) Stay of Plan Termination for 5-Star Program Underachievers
  • Mandate to Allow Medicare Advantage Enrollment for ESRD Beneficiaries
  • Implementation of a 3-Month Open Disenrollment Option for All Beneficiaries

Full Impact to be Phased-In over Payment Years 2019 through 2022


The Cures Act instructs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to improve the determination methodology of a beneficiary’s health status by factoring in the count of an individual’s total conditions. Furthermore, additional adjustments are to be applied as an individual’s total number of conditions increases. In practice, these changes will raise risk capitation payments, on a sliding, “HCC count per beneficiary” scale.

  • Pulse8 foresees the development of a multiplier variable applied to an individual’s calculated HCC risk factor. The multiplier would serve to increase an individual’s base risk factor incrementally by a member’s total condition count.
  • The impact of this methodological risk score augmentation will be to spike capitation payments for beneficiaries carrying multiple conditions. Plans with relatively high “average conditions per beneficiary” will see higher PMPM capitation revenue.
Pulse8 Insight:

The value of capturing all of a beneficiary’s risk-adjusted conditions will become that much more valuable with this update. MA plans should make sure their HCC diagnosis targeting analytics include co-morbid clinical rules to adjust intervention lists accordingly. For example, plans should have analytics programming to account for the following scenario: Beneficiary X and Y have different HCC gaps with nearly equal risk factor potential. Beneficiary X’s associated conditions have a relatively high HCC co-morbidity rate, whereas beneficiary Y’s disease profile is not indicative of overlapping conditions. In this scenario, with all other variables equal, beneficiary X’s potential risk score value is now (due to the changes of the Cures Act) higher than that of beneficiary Y. The plan’s gap closure analysis and reporting should reflect this valuation to realize the higher risk to beneficiary X’s well-being.

This article continues.  Please download full article from this link.

Pulse8:  Your ONLY Partner for Risk Adjustment & Quality Analytics

For more information, please visit www.Pulse8.com or call (410) 928-4218

Categories: Risk Adjustment
Tags: risk adjustment, 21st century cures act

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

Keep M.E.A.T. on Your List for a Healthy Audit

By Jeanmarie Loria, Advize Health, LLC If you’re reading this article, chances are you already know what HCC Coding is – but we’ll give you a refresher anyway. Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) and Risk Adjustment Coding is a CMS-mandated payment model. This model works to identify those with chronic and other serious illnesses and prescribes a risk factor score to each patient, taking into consideration their ailments and other demographics. With every payment model comes a specific set of audit and review requirements that must be met to maintain the integrity of the system, and this is where MEAT (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, Treat) comes in handy. In a face to face visit M.E.A.T. maybe found in the chief complaint, history of present illness, review of systems, physical exam, assessment and/or plan....
Read More

Getting It Right: True North in Healthcare Reform

The movement to repeal and replace "ObamaCare" created so much political noise that clear thinking has been hard to come by. The 2010 legislation that created the marketplace for individuals and small business (the Affordable Care Act or ACA), has almost evolved into a political Rorschach test. The more that politicized options and alternatives to repealing, replacing, or repairing it were discussed, the harder it was to put into focus the original problems the legislation was designed to address. Nevertheless, the rancorous divisions over what needs to happen to fix problems in the individual insurance market remain a distraction from the real issue at hand: the cost of healthcare weighing down the economy and what we need to do to fix it. With all the intense debates swirling around this topic, an impression emerges that “solving the ObamaCare issues” is something that must be accomplished as an isolated matter, discrete and independent of other problems. The heated debates concentrate on the mechanics and tactics required to solve the "uninsured problem", the "under-insured problem", and for some, the federal budget problems created by the subsidies for low-income enrollees in these plans. This single-issue mono-vision obscures a reality that must be addressed. This perspective completely misses the fact that something is going on that is far more corrosive to the wellbeing of all of us as consumers of health care, as taxpayers, and as a nation: something that overshadows the tug ‘o war over ObamaCare. The critical and overlooked issue is that health care expenditures in the U.S are at least twice as expensive as other nations, which consume so much of the national economy...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

Successful and Meaningful Techniques for Integrating Risk and Quality Interventions

Quality measurement and risk adjustment regulations are increasing and the financial impact upon health plans is progressively driving accountability and influencing profitability through payments, penalties, and bonuses. To improve performance and optimize risk and quality payments, Health Plans need to streamline processes, employ best practices for data capture, and focus on strategic interventions that use a member-centric approach.  

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.