Does the Public Believe the Headlines?

Here is what the article says: Feds Knew About Medicare Advantage Overcharges Years Ago

This article is very disturbing. It is so easy to hate insurance companies and assume that this is all true without understanding the more complex story. I think we risk getting the "baby thrown out with the bath water" if we cannot spell out the value of risk adjustment and accountable care, compared with the failings of FFS healthcare. 

I find that people get stopped at the headllines without understanding what it all really means because, unless you are involved in risk adjustment, it is difficult to understand. Let's use an example and see if this makes sense to you.

A pair of identical twins have the exact same health conditions and see the same doctor for care. The doctor is a great clinician, treats the twins exactly the same way and documents well in his charts, but he is lazy putting the diagnostic codes on the claims. 

One of the twins has a Medicare Supplement policy while the other is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. 
Using the CMS risk adjustment model, the skimpy diagnostic codes are used to predict how much the expected health care costs would be for both twins in the coming year. Let us say that, using this methodology the Medicare Advantage plan receives $12,000 over the year based on the overly simplified ICD-9 codes supplied by the doctor. But, if the health plan had sent in a coder to read the doctor's charts to determine what the true health conditions were instead of relying solely on the claims data, the adjustments to the premiums from CMS would have been $24,000 annually. But the health plan did not do that and just received the $12,000. 
Now fast forward a year and the higher costs come true because the twins were actually twice as sick as the ICD-9 codes from the claims suggested. Who pays for that doubled cost of care for each of the twins? 
In the case of the twin with the Medicare Supplement, Medicare pays for it because they must. But for the twin with the Medicare Advantage plan, the health plan pays for it from the premiums received based on the risk adjusted payment model. However, the premiums were only half what they should have been and the health plan has to still pay for the actual health care provided. 
The U.S. taxpayer, through Medicare, pays for the actual health care due to the true health conditions of the beneficiaries under Original Medicare, even if the diagnostic coding is poor. However, the Medicare Advantage plan receives underpayment for the same beneficiary because the diagnostic coding is poor. 
If the Medicare Advantage health plan had sent in a coder and got the risk adjusted payment levels at the accurate levels, they would have received adequate payment for the health care costs based on the true burden of illness. That payment level would more closely approximate what Original Medicare ended up paying for the identical twin on the Medicare Supplement plan, since CMS is getting closer to paying MA plans at 100% of FFS levels now. The taxpayer is indifferent. Yet the diagnostic codes supplied for the one twin is twice the number of codes supplied for the other twin.

The punchline to this story then is that people that are alarmed by the much higher number of diagnostic codes associated with Medicare Advantage members compared with FFS Medicare beneficiaries are making the incorrect assumption that the health plans are over-coding to earn additional premiums to which they are not entitled.  But the differences in coding levels is actually due to lazy diagnostic coding on the part of providers under a FFS system.  


FFS Medicare is drastically under-coded for diagnoses, and if Medicare Advantage plans were simply passively accepting the same level of coding, the taxpayers would realize enormous short term savings in comparison to FFS Medicare costs.  Of course, as time goes on, the healthplans would go broke subsidizing the undercoded beneficiaries.


Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account


Latest Posts

CMS Gives EDPS Transition Some Breathing Room

CMS published the final call letter for 2018 yesterday, April 3, which included a welcome accouncement regarding the transition from RAPS to EDPS-based RAF scores. Citing numerous public comments on the subject, CMS throttled back the speed with which they plan to switch over to an encounter-based methodology. Instead of the blended rates originally contemplated, they announced that the more modest blend of 85% RAPS to 15% EDPS would be used in 2018, allowing more time to improve the reliability of the encounter data methods. While the RISE data collaboration study was not cited, we believe that the educational value of our study, along with our communication and advocacy of a more moderate approach by CMS, contributed to the confidence with which plans and other interested parties spoke up during the open comment period. Once again, we owe thanks to the folks at Avalere and Inovalon, as well as at AHIP, for the collegial and professional collaboration. Also, we want to thank the health plans that actively participated in our study for making this work possible. ...
Read More

Take Aways from RISE Nashville Summit

The 11th Annual RISE Nashville Summit continued the event’s tradition of yearly growth. The return to downtown Nashville was widely applauded by attendees, who were glad to be back near Broadway’s nighttime funk and fun. While festive, this year's event occurred in the wake of the new administration in Washington, D.C., and the healthcare themes surrounding the "repeal and replace" of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) cast a long shadow. In contrast to the upbeat, confident notes struck by last year’s keynote speaker Senator Tom Daschle, this year’s sobering keynote address by Howard Fineman, NBC/MSNBC political analyst, The Huffington Post Media Group global editorial director, and bestselling author, was an assessment of the pluses and minuses of our new president. Mr. Fineman's remarks indicated that the political alliances in power will seek to undo what Senator Daschle viewed as "irreversible” a year ago....
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

The Impact of Quality Incentive Models in Medicaid Markets


Thirty-one of our fifty states now have Medicaid managed care, and several markets are expected to implement managed care in the next few years. More than $160B in Medicaid spending occurs through the Managed Care Organizations. As more and more states seek to do more with less, increasing accountability for health quality outcomes is placed on health plans. Join this webinar to learn the typical quality payment approaches states use, issues often faced by health plans under each model and what states are expected to do with payment models tied to quality performance in light of near term Medicaid reform efforts.


Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.