HCC Coder Survey: Profile of the Community


Early in 2016, RISE was approached by one of the association sponsors, Apixio, about conducting a survey of the HCC coder community.  They wanted a better picture of the way the coders work and the tools they use in their jobs.  As a technology company, of course, Apixio was keen to understand to what extent the community is comfortable with and uses technology in their daily jobs.  RISE felt that this would be a useful survey as a mirror back to the HCC coding community about themselves and how their peers work.  RISE supplied a mailing list of known HCC coding members for the purpose of inviting them to participant in this study.  No marketing was permitted, just the profiling survey.  

Here are the results, which we promised we would share with you.  We hope you find it of interest.  Please let us know if you have questions and we will facilitate getting answers for you. 

Apixio 2016 Coding Survey Summary

In January, Apixio conducted a coding survey. We recruited coders, QA supervisors, and directors involved in risk adjustment coding via RISE’s mailing list, Facebook groups, and LinkedIn groups. We secured 111 responses, from 52 coders, 23 coder managers, 13 director/executives, and 23 other affiliations. Below are some takeaways:


The Risk Adjustment Coding Community is an Experienced, Educated Group

55% of coders, coder managers, and directors have more than four years of experience in their current role (we chose to present options up to four years, so it’s possible that they could have much more).  Demographically, survey respondents are overwhelmingly female (89%), over half are over 45 years of age, and over half have a B.A. or Master’s degree.

Coders Have a High Degree of Comfort with Technology

97% of survey takers feel “very comfortable” with computers. However, while working, 75% of coders say they use books as a resource, more than those who use ICD­10 websites or software. Survey takers work with both electronic and traditional chart formats; 82% of surveyed coders review EHR charts and 55% of them review PDF charts.

Coders Work From Home, but Managers Work From the Office

Coders and QA reviewers tend to work at home (59%), although coder managers and project managers tend to work in an office. In terms of where they are online, LinkedIn is the most popular social network, with over 70% of survey takers participating in the professional networking site, with far fewer survey­takers on Facebook and Twitter.

Most Managers Supervise Small Teams, without Coding Software

Most managers are in charge of small teams; half of managers manage 1­5 coders. A fifth of managers are outliers in this regard, managing more than 20 coders. Coding software [performance technology and analytics] is not yet a prevalent aspect of coding, Only 27% of managers use coding software to help supervise their team and only a slightly higher percentage use software to facilitate coding.

Accuracy is the Biggest Goal for Both Coders and Managers

The top three responsibilities cited by managers are: tracking project progress, setting up and managing a project timeline, and tracking performance. The top three goals are: being accurate in that all the codes found accurately represent the patient state, being accurate in that all the codes found will be confirmed by QA, and finding as many codes as possible in the shortest amount of time.

Brought to you by the Apixio User Research Team

Tags: HCC coding, technology, risk adjustment, survey

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

Keep M.E.A.T. on Your List for a Healthy Audit

By Jeanmarie Loria, Advize Health, LLC If you’re reading this article, chances are you already know what HCC Coding is – but we’ll give you a refresher anyway. Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) and Risk Adjustment Coding is a CMS-mandated payment model. This model works to identify those with chronic and other serious illnesses and prescribes a risk factor score to each patient, taking into consideration their ailments and other demographics. With every payment model comes a specific set of audit and review requirements that must be met to maintain the integrity of the system, and this is where MEAT (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, Treat) comes in handy. In a face to face visit M.E.A.T. maybe found in the chief complaint, history of present illness, review of systems, physical exam, assessment and/or plan....
Read More

Getting It Right: True North in Healthcare Reform

The movement to repeal and replace "ObamaCare" created so much political noise that clear thinking has been hard to come by. The 2010 legislation that created the marketplace for individuals and small business (the Affordable Care Act or ACA), has almost evolved into a political Rorschach test. The more that politicized options and alternatives to repealing, replacing, or repairing it were discussed, the harder it was to put into focus the original problems the legislation was designed to address. Nevertheless, the rancorous divisions over what needs to happen to fix problems in the individual insurance market remain a distraction from the real issue at hand: the cost of healthcare weighing down the economy and what we need to do to fix it. With all the intense debates swirling around this topic, an impression emerges that “solving the ObamaCare issues” is something that must be accomplished as an isolated matter, discrete and independent of other problems. The heated debates concentrate on the mechanics and tactics required to solve the "uninsured problem", the "under-insured problem", and for some, the federal budget problems created by the subsidies for low-income enrollees in these plans. This single-issue mono-vision obscures a reality that must be addressed. This perspective completely misses the fact that something is going on that is far more corrosive to the wellbeing of all of us as consumers of health care, as taxpayers, and as a nation: something that overshadows the tug ‘o war over ObamaCare. The critical and overlooked issue is that health care expenditures in the U.S are at least twice as expensive as other nations, which consume so much of the national economy...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

Successful and Meaningful Techniques for Integrating Risk and Quality Interventions

Quality measurement and risk adjustment regulations are increasing and the financial impact upon health plans is progressively driving accountability and influencing profitability through payments, penalties, and bonuses. To improve performance and optimize risk and quality payments, Health Plans need to streamline processes, employ best practices for data capture, and focus on strategic interventions that use a member-centric approach.  

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.