ICD-10 Coding and GEMs


January 11, 2016

The General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs) are a series of crosswalks created by CMS to help all organizations dealing with the ICD-10 transition translate from ICD-9 to ICD-10 quickly and easily.  Unfortunately, many organizations have simply installed the GEMs into their coding or billing systems without understanding the implications of doing so.  This is an invitation for inaccurate coding.

The GEMs cannot be relied upon for complete and accurate coding.  All coders should rely upon the ICD-10 book(s) or an officially certified electronic resource when selecting ICD-10 codes.  Coders should utilize the process they were taught at the beginning of their training: seek the diagnostic terminology in the index, review the tabular for any special notes and to confirm code selection, then assign the code.

There are nearly 70,000 diagnosis codes in ICD-10.  The vast majority of these (over 90%) are different in their specific language than ICD-9 codes.  According to the AAPC, a recent study noted 445 instances when a single ICD-9 code can map to more than 50 possible ICD-10 codes; and 210 instances where a single ICD-9 code can map to more than 100ICD-10 codes (Healthcare Business News, Nov. 2015).  It is impossible for an automated system to accurately and correctly assign ICD-10 codes.

CMS concurs with this recommendation.  In their GEMs FAQ document, the organization notes that, “The GEMs are not a substitute for learning how to use ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS… [I]t will be more efficient and accurate to work from the medical record documentation and then select the appropriate code(s) from the coding book or encoder system.”  (See website below.)

What then is the purpose of the GEMs?  CMS notes that the mappings are intended to assist with converting databases and other technical systems, including DRGs.  That is, the GEMs will help us translate old material into ICD-10 for comparison purposes, but should not be used in lieu of a trained ICD-10 coder for current diagnostic reporting.

For more information on GEMs, please see the CMS FAQ : https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding/icd10/downloads/gems-crosswalksbasicfaq.pdf

Original Posting:  https://www.episource.com/blog_post/icd10coding_and_gems/


Tags: HIX, GEMS, Crosswalk

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

Keep M.E.A.T. on Your List for a Healthy Audit

By Jeanmarie Loria, Advize Health, LLC If you’re reading this article, chances are you already know what HCC Coding is – but we’ll give you a refresher anyway. Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) and Risk Adjustment Coding is a CMS-mandated payment model. This model works to identify those with chronic and other serious illnesses and prescribes a risk factor score to each patient, taking into consideration their ailments and other demographics. With every payment model comes a specific set of audit and review requirements that must be met to maintain the integrity of the system, and this is where MEAT (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, Treat) comes in handy. In a face to face visit M.E.A.T. maybe found in the chief complaint, history of present illness, review of systems, physical exam, assessment and/or plan....
Read More

Getting It Right: True North in Healthcare Reform

The movement to repeal and replace "ObamaCare" created so much political noise that clear thinking has been hard to come by. The 2010 legislation that created the marketplace for individuals and small business (the Affordable Care Act or ACA), has almost evolved into a political Rorschach test. The more that politicized options and alternatives to repealing, replacing, or repairing it were discussed, the harder it was to put into focus the original problems the legislation was designed to address. Nevertheless, the rancorous divisions over what needs to happen to fix problems in the individual insurance market remain a distraction from the real issue at hand: the cost of healthcare weighing down the economy and what we need to do to fix it. With all the intense debates swirling around this topic, an impression emerges that “solving the ObamaCare issues” is something that must be accomplished as an isolated matter, discrete and independent of other problems. The heated debates concentrate on the mechanics and tactics required to solve the "uninsured problem", the "under-insured problem", and for some, the federal budget problems created by the subsidies for low-income enrollees in these plans. This single-issue mono-vision obscures a reality that must be addressed. This perspective completely misses the fact that something is going on that is far more corrosive to the wellbeing of all of us as consumers of health care, as taxpayers, and as a nation: something that overshadows the tug ‘o war over ObamaCare. The critical and overlooked issue is that health care expenditures in the U.S are at least twice as expensive as other nations, which consume so much of the national economy...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

Successful and Meaningful Techniques for Integrating Risk and Quality Interventions

Quality measurement and risk adjustment regulations are increasing and the financial impact upon health plans is progressively driving accountability and influencing profitability through payments, penalties, and bonuses. To improve performance and optimize risk and quality payments, Health Plans need to streamline processes, employ best practices for data capture, and focus on strategic interventions that use a member-centric approach.  

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.