Insights from the HCC Coding Accuracy Workshop: Physician Engagement

I had the opportunity to participate in the RISE Risk Adjustment Academy workshops in Boston on October 21 and 22. Both workshops were great and I found myself taking a lot of notes. As I absorbed the information from the HCC Coding Accuracy program in particular, I realized some insights about HCC coding that were new and exciting to me.

One of the ideas was about the frequent disconnect between physicians and coders. Others brought up this topic before but it received extra attention in our workshop and was clarified for me by Donna Malone, one of our terrific faculty members from the Tufts Health Plan in Boston. 

The physician mind is focused on the associated process of evaluating, treating and managing the health conditions presented by each patient. The chart documentation provided by the physician is all framed in the language of diagnostic phrasing and language, and certainly not about codes. A lot of what wording goes into the chart depends on how the physician was trained. When the administrative side of the practice arises, the physician looks to those staff members that he / she has hired to take things from there, whether it be billing, scheduling or whatnot. There is an assumed handoff to others to pick up from where the physician left off and the others began their work.

When the health plan or hired third parties begin hunting down ICD codes, the physician is ill equipped to speak directly to those elements. Instead, it is up to the coders to do the translation work. It is not for the coder to impose or assume ICD codes:  those must be garnered from what is reflected in the chart. But if the charting fails to describe fully what is required to substantiate a particular ICD code, it is necessary to work with the physicians to bridge the language gap so that the documentation in the future can be more fulsome and complete.

Herein lies the ticklish problem of physician education. The idea is not to make coders out of physicians. It is to arm them with an understanding of why the diagnostic phrasing needs to be more comprehensive and complete. But why should a physician make the effort to do so?  Why not continue on with the current approach to charting?

The education of physicians begins with the idea that the handoff to others downstream has a big impact on those depending on certain kinds of information that only the physician can supply. Secondly, the quality of that information will impact the stakeholders in ways that the physician probably never realized. Ultimately, it will boomerang around and affect the patients and the physicians themselves. It is really up to us to provide the education about those linkages and what to do about them.

In a classic business environment, the process engineers would ask for business requirements to determine what information is needed by the downstream users in order to push back to the original source: in this case, the physician. If the physicians’ perspective is that they are operating in their own practices and the phraseology they choose has a narrow purpose, then they do not realize how useful their documentation is downstream.

The coder’s ability to extract accurate codes is what governs the comprehensiveness of the HCC codes that drive revenues in the case of Medicare Advantage, Accountable Care Organizations, managed Medicaid plans and the new health insurance marketplace. Follow the thread and you end up with at least 85% of the premium dollars spent on health care services for the members. The richer the premiums based upon risk adjustment using the ICD code building blocks, the better the benefit coverage and the lower the premiums for the members.  We are talking about the doctors’ patients.

If the correct and complete information is provided upfront by the physicians in the charts, there is less administrative expense to chew away at the health care dollar in the long run. There is less chart pulling and intrusion from the payers and their hired vendors that parachute into the physicians’ practices.

Additionally, if the physicians are working in a risk-sharing model such as an MSSP or Pioneer ACO, or under global or shared risk capitation, then have a stake in the accuracy of the premiums or financial budgets, as well. This is the way in which the financial rewards of operating under these kinds of programs come back to the physicians who are looking to pivot away from volume-based reimbursement and towards a value-based model.

Apart from the financial implications, the powerful tools of population health care management are much less effective if the clinical insights garnered from the ICD codes are compromised by poor or ineffective chart documentation. Valuable programs such as complex care case management, quality improvement, medication therapy management depend on good clinical information, which impact the value of coordinated care plans for health plan members.

In short and simple terms, the physicians no longer operate in a bubble within their office practice space. The interconnectivity requirements of health care today and tomorrow place a high value on getting the clinical insights from the physician expressed in a clear and comprehensive manner so that everyone else in the chain has the benefit of understanding what the physician knows about the patients. In this whole process, the patients will benefit by having better health care coverage and lower out of pocket costs, and the physicians will ultimately receive a share of the financial rewards for providing care in an interdependent environment. This is an essential theme of health care reform. 

Tags: workshop, HCC coding, RISE

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

Keep M.E.A.T. on Your List for a Healthy Audit

By Jeanmarie Loria, Advize Health, LLC If you’re reading this article, chances are you already know what HCC Coding is – but we’ll give you a refresher anyway. Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) and Risk Adjustment Coding is a CMS-mandated payment model. This model works to identify those with chronic and other serious illnesses and prescribes a risk factor score to each patient, taking into consideration their ailments and other demographics. With every payment model comes a specific set of audit and review requirements that must be met to maintain the integrity of the system, and this is where MEAT (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, Treat) comes in handy. In a face to face visit M.E.A.T. maybe found in the chief complaint, history of present illness, review of systems, physical exam, assessment and/or plan....
Read More

Getting It Right: True North in Healthcare Reform

The movement to repeal and replace "ObamaCare" created so much political noise that clear thinking has been hard to come by. The 2010 legislation that created the marketplace for individuals and small business (the Affordable Care Act or ACA), has almost evolved into a political Rorschach test. The more that politicized options and alternatives to repealing, replacing, or repairing it were discussed, the harder it was to put into focus the original problems the legislation was designed to address. Nevertheless, the rancorous divisions over what needs to happen to fix problems in the individual insurance market remain a distraction from the real issue at hand: the cost of healthcare weighing down the economy and what we need to do to fix it. With all the intense debates swirling around this topic, an impression emerges that “solving the ObamaCare issues” is something that must be accomplished as an isolated matter, discrete and independent of other problems. The heated debates concentrate on the mechanics and tactics required to solve the "uninsured problem", the "under-insured problem", and for some, the federal budget problems created by the subsidies for low-income enrollees in these plans. This single-issue mono-vision obscures a reality that must be addressed. This perspective completely misses the fact that something is going on that is far more corrosive to the wellbeing of all of us as consumers of health care, as taxpayers, and as a nation: something that overshadows the tug ‘o war over ObamaCare. The critical and overlooked issue is that health care expenditures in the U.S are at least twice as expensive as other nations, which consume so much of the national economy...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

Successful and Meaningful Techniques for Integrating Risk and Quality Interventions

Quality measurement and risk adjustment regulations are increasing and the financial impact upon health plans is progressively driving accountability and influencing profitability through payments, penalties, and bonuses. To improve performance and optimize risk and quality payments, Health Plans need to streamline processes, employ best practices for data capture, and focus on strategic interventions that use a member-centric approach.  

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.