The Health Insurance Exchanges RADV Audit Process

Tim Buxton, MBA, CPC, CIC, COC, CRC, CCS, CHP

November 25, 2015

For health plans (insurers) participating in the Health Insurance Exchanges (HIX), one important aspect of the program is the Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audit.  RADV audits have existed for several years in the Medicare Advantage program, but there are several important differences in the HIX (“Commercial”) sphere.

While the 2015 Commercial RADV audits were indefinitely delayed and ultimately foregone, HHS has indicated its intention to begin a six-stage data validation program as follows:

  • Sample selection: HHS determines a “statistically sound” sample size of enrollees from each state in which an insurer operates. This sample will cover applicable subpopulations for each issuer, such as enrollees with and without reported RA diagnoses.
  • Initial Aalidation Audit (IVA): Issuers will conduct an independent audit of the risk adjustment data for their sampled enrollees.
    • Insurers must ensure that the auditor performing this review is “reasonably capable,” and free from interest; that the audit is complete; and that the auditor submits information to HHS in the manner and time frame specified by HHS. This auditor must not be involved in the issuer’s current risk adjustment activities.
    • The issuer’s audit should cover: validation of existing HCC diagnoses; capture of new (missing) HCC diagnoses; and validation of demographic information for patients lacking HCC diagnoses.
  • Second Validation Audit (SVA): HHS will retain an independent second validation auditor to verify the accuracy of a sub-sample of the IVA findings.
  • Error estimation: HHS will estimate risk score error rates based upon validation findings.
  • Appeals: Issuers will have opportunity appeal both IVA and SVA findings.
  • Payment adjustment: In a prospective approach, the issuer’s error rate from the prior year will be utilized to adjust the issuer’s average risk score in the current transfer year. HHS reserves the right to adjust payments for issuers who do not follow the validation audit standards.

(follow the link for the complete blog article:  https://www.episource.com/blog_post/radvauditprocess/)  

 


Categories: Risk Adjustment, HIX
Tags: RADV

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

Keep M.E.A.T. on Your List for a Healthy Audit

By Jeanmarie Loria, Advize Health, LLC If you’re reading this article, chances are you already know what HCC Coding is – but we’ll give you a refresher anyway. Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) and Risk Adjustment Coding is a CMS-mandated payment model. This model works to identify those with chronic and other serious illnesses and prescribes a risk factor score to each patient, taking into consideration their ailments and other demographics. With every payment model comes a specific set of audit and review requirements that must be met to maintain the integrity of the system, and this is where MEAT (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, Treat) comes in handy. In a face to face visit M.E.A.T. maybe found in the chief complaint, history of present illness, review of systems, physical exam, assessment and/or plan....
Read More

Getting It Right: True North in Healthcare Reform

The movement to repeal and replace "ObamaCare" created so much political noise that clear thinking has been hard to come by. The 2010 legislation that created the marketplace for individuals and small business (the Affordable Care Act or ACA), has almost evolved into a political Rorschach test. The more that politicized options and alternatives to repealing, replacing, or repairing it were discussed, the harder it was to put into focus the original problems the legislation was designed to address. Nevertheless, the rancorous divisions over what needs to happen to fix problems in the individual insurance market remain a distraction from the real issue at hand: the cost of healthcare weighing down the economy and what we need to do to fix it. With all the intense debates swirling around this topic, an impression emerges that “solving the ObamaCare issues” is something that must be accomplished as an isolated matter, discrete and independent of other problems. The heated debates concentrate on the mechanics and tactics required to solve the "uninsured problem", the "under-insured problem", and for some, the federal budget problems created by the subsidies for low-income enrollees in these plans. This single-issue mono-vision obscures a reality that must be addressed. This perspective completely misses the fact that something is going on that is far more corrosive to the wellbeing of all of us as consumers of health care, as taxpayers, and as a nation: something that overshadows the tug ‘o war over ObamaCare. The critical and overlooked issue is that health care expenditures in the U.S are at least twice as expensive as other nations, which consume so much of the national economy...
Read More

Upcoming Conference

 

Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.

More

Upcoming Webinar

Successful and Meaningful Techniques for Integrating Risk and Quality Interventions

Quality measurement and risk adjustment regulations are increasing and the financial impact upon health plans is progressively driving accountability and influencing profitability through payments, penalties, and bonuses. To improve performance and optimize risk and quality payments, Health Plans need to streamline processes, employ best practices for data capture, and focus on strategic interventions that use a member-centric approach.  

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.