Where To Now on the HIX Marketplace?

It appears that there is a popular backlash against the reforms that HHS wants to conduct in the HIX marketplace outlined in their proposed rules.  The following Modern Healthcare article suggests that the overriding issue that the public is concerned about is achieving some kind of stable path for premiums and the elimination of the big swings from one year to the next.  HHS, in contrast, is trying to impose some restrictions and uniformity like CMS did in the Medicare Advantage world:  regulations around what a provider network can look like, standardized benefit packages (not just actuarial values), and so on.  The payer community objects to such restrictions which, they claim, will cause further pricing disruptions to accommodate these new rules.   You always have to take these complaints as containing a kernel of truth but you never know how accurate their objections are in proportion to their financial priorities. 


 Instability of pricing is not going to be overcome in just two or three annual cycles:  it is going to require more time.  You can look back to 2005 when Part D was introduced to Medicare Advantage (Medicare + Choice then).   The first round of pricing is completely based off actuarial guesses using the closest proxy data from some other line of business.  By the time pricing has to be submitted for the second cycle, there is not enough claims data to really do good pricing either, so year 2 is just some carbon copy of year 1 plus some actuarial estimate of annual trend applied.  Year 3 begins to see some settling out with real data.

 The problem in the HIX world, however, in contrast with Medicare Advantage, is the whole zero-sum risk adjustment game underneath it.  For year three, there are several ways you can lose money, and I understand that 60% of the HIX plans did just that when you remove risk corridor payments.

  • Pricing was too low for the actual risk selection and you lose money on utilization and unit cost of care
  • Pricing is too low because the risk adjustment process did not adequately capture the ICD codes and other competing plans did a better job and sucked money away in the final settlement
  • Shock claims were more frequent and bigger than expected and the final government reserves for risk corridors were inadequate and recovered only 12.6 cents on the dollar
  • Pricing was adequate, risk selection was within reasonable limits, but the expenses involved in doing risk adjustment were matched by competitors and nothing was recovered in the risk adjustment settlement process, leaving the issuer upside down from administrative costs
  • In the future, risk corridors are going away, so that will no longer save 60% who lost money
  • 100% RADV audits will begin in 2016, introducing a whole new set of math exercises to price into the equation

With these added complexities, achieving some kind of equilibrium in premium pricing is going to take some time to wash these dynamic factors through.  In the meanwhile, the question is what tolerance there is in the marketplace for price fluctuations.  Certainly with larger premium subsidies for the low income folks, there is less sensitivity to price swings.  But those individuals bearing the brunt of these price changes may not want to hang in there while the market corrects itself.

There is some room for optimism, nevertheless.  While we saw a large spike in health care cost inflation due to people accessing health care using their new HIX plans, that utilization surge may even out in a couple years as people get established and under control.  We saw that with Medicare Advantage where the larger portion of the population got coverage initially and overused it, once they were stable, the future new enrollment waves were diluted by the larger population already taken into care.  

Categories: Risk Adjustment, HIX
Tags: risk adjustment, HIX, health insurance exchanges, ACA

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account


Latest Posts

CMS Gives EDPS Transition Some Breathing Room

CMS published the final call letter for 2018 yesterday, April 3, which included a welcome accouncement regarding the transition from RAPS to EDPS-based RAF scores. Citing numerous public comments on the subject, CMS throttled back the speed with which they plan to switch over to an encounter-based methodology. Instead of the blended rates originally contemplated, they announced that the more modest blend of 85% RAPS to 15% EDPS would be used in 2018, allowing more time to improve the reliability of the encounter data methods. While the RISE data collaboration study was not cited, we believe that the educational value of our study, along with our communication and advocacy of a more moderate approach by CMS, contributed to the confidence with which plans and other interested parties spoke up during the open comment period. Once again, we owe thanks to the folks at Avalere and Inovalon, as well as at AHIP, for the collegial and professional collaboration. Also, we want to thank the health plans that actively participated in our study for making this work possible. ...
Read More

Take Aways from RISE Nashville Summit

The 11th Annual RISE Nashville Summit continued the event’s tradition of yearly growth. The return to downtown Nashville was widely applauded by attendees, who were glad to be back near Broadway’s nighttime funk and fun. While festive, this year's event occurred in the wake of the new administration in Washington, D.C., and the healthcare themes surrounding the "repeal and replace" of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) cast a long shadow. In contrast to the upbeat, confident notes struck by last year’s keynote speaker Senator Tom Daschle, this year’s sobering keynote address by Howard Fineman, NBC/MSNBC political analyst, The Huffington Post Media Group global editorial director, and bestselling author, was an assessment of the pluses and minuses of our new president. Mr. Fineman's remarks indicated that the political alliances in power will seek to undo what Senator Daschle viewed as "irreversible” a year ago....
Read More

Upcoming Conference


Qualipalooza: The 2nd Annual RISE Quality Leadership Summit 

This unique event incorporates three conferences presented side-by-side: the Star Ratings Strategic Planning Forum, the HEDIS Forum, and the CAHPS, HOS & Member Survey Forum. Register for one conference for an in-depth examination of a single area, or design your own event by opting for the all-access pass and choosing the sessions from each conference which correspond exactly to your interests.


Upcoming Webinar

The Impact of Quality Incentive Models in Medicaid Markets


Thirty-one of our fifty states now have Medicaid managed care, and several markets are expected to implement managed care in the next few years. More than $160B in Medicaid spending occurs through the Managed Care Organizations. As more and more states seek to do more with less, increasing accountability for health quality outcomes is placed on health plans. Join this webinar to learn the typical quality payment approaches states use, issues often faced by health plans under each model and what states are expected to do with payment models tied to quality performance in light of near term Medicaid reform efforts.


Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.