Does the Public Believe the Headlines?

Here is what the article says: Feds Knew About Medicare Advantage Overcharges Years Ago

This article is very disturbing. It is so easy to hate insurance companies and assume that this is all true without understanding the more complex story. I think we risk getting the "baby thrown out with the bath water" if we cannot spell out the value of risk adjustment and accountable care, compared with the failings of FFS healthcare. 

I find that people get stopped at the headllines without understanding what it all really means because, unless you are involved in risk adjustment, it is difficult to understand. Let's use an example and see if this makes sense to you.

A pair of identical twins have the exact same health conditions and see the same doctor for care. The doctor is a great clinician, treats the twins exactly the same way and documents well in his charts, but he is lazy putting the diagnostic codes on the claims. 

One of the twins has a Medicare Supplement policy while the other is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. 
Using the CMS risk adjustment model, the skimpy diagnostic codes are used to predict how much the expected health care costs would be for both twins in the coming year. Let us say that, using this methodology the Medicare Advantage plan receives $12,000 over the year based on the overly simplified ICD-9 codes supplied by the doctor. But, if the health plan had sent in a coder to read the doctor's charts to determine what the true health conditions were instead of relying solely on the claims data, the adjustments to the premiums from CMS would have been $24,000 annually. But the health plan did not do that and just received the $12,000. 
Now fast forward a year and the higher costs come true because the twins were actually twice as sick as the ICD-9 codes from the claims suggested. Who pays for that doubled cost of care for each of the twins? 
In the case of the twin with the Medicare Supplement, Medicare pays for it because they must. But for the twin with the Medicare Advantage plan, the health plan pays for it from the premiums received based on the risk adjusted payment model. However, the premiums were only half what they should have been and the health plan has to still pay for the actual health care provided. 
The U.S. taxpayer, through Medicare, pays for the actual health care due to the true health conditions of the beneficiaries under Original Medicare, even if the diagnostic coding is poor. However, the Medicare Advantage plan receives underpayment for the same beneficiary because the diagnostic coding is poor. 
If the Medicare Advantage health plan had sent in a coder and got the risk adjusted payment levels at the accurate levels, they would have received adequate payment for the health care costs based on the true burden of illness. That payment level would more closely approximate what Original Medicare ended up paying for the identical twin on the Medicare Supplement plan, since CMS is getting closer to paying MA plans at 100% of FFS levels now. The taxpayer is indifferent. Yet the diagnostic codes supplied for the one twin is twice the number of codes supplied for the other twin.

The punchline to this story then is that people that are alarmed by the much higher number of diagnostic codes associated with Medicare Advantage members compared with FFS Medicare beneficiaries are making the incorrect assumption that the health plans are over-coding to earn additional premiums to which they are not entitled.  But the differences in coding levels is actually due to lazy diagnostic coding on the part of providers under a FFS system.  


FFS Medicare is drastically under-coded for diagnoses, and if Medicare Advantage plans were simply passively accepting the same level of coding, the taxpayers would realize enormous short term savings in comparison to FFS Medicare costs.  Of course, as time goes on, the healthplans would go broke subsidizing the undercoded beneficiaries.


Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

It’s not Obamacare anymore. It’s our national health-care system.

By Drew Altman and Larry Levitt July 29 Drew Altman is president and chief executive of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Larry Levitt is senior vice president of the Kaiser Foundation. Republicans failed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act early Friday because of divisions within their own ranks, and because they tried not only to repeal and replace the ACA but also to cut and cap the Medicaid program, generating opposition from many red-state governors and their senators. But most of all, they failed because they built their various plans on the false claim — busted by the Congressional Budget Office — that they could maintain the same coverage levels as the ACA and lower premiums and deductibles, while at the same time slashing about a trillion dollars from Medicaid and ACA subsidies and softening the ACA’s consumer protection regulations. Had they succeeded, they would have won a big short-term victory with their base, which strongly supports repeal, but suffered the consequences in subsequent elections as the same voters lost coverage or were hit with higher premiums and deductibles. ...
Read More

Where to Now? True North Again

By Kevin Mowll, Executive Director of the RISE Association The failure of the Republicans to repeal, replace, or wreck ObamaCare is a wakeup call for everyone, not just Republicans. While the RISE Association steers away from purely political commentary, the lesson of this protracted political mess needs to be called out for the sake of putting our priorities straight around public policy regarding healthcare reform. In the attached Wall Street Journal article, which suggests that bipartisan solutions are the only remaining way forward, the author proffers hope that the blistering truth will be obvious to all the participants in the 7-year-long fracas around repeal and replace. The bloodied players may still brood in frustration that their political wills were not enough to win, but the author wonders if cooler heads will prevail. I, for one, am not so sanguine; yet I can only hope. The lesson I take away from the many years of wrangling is that the ObamaCare political football games demonstrates that political wills are not the way forward. They lose sight of the True North issue at hand. Rather, the failures of both political parties in arriving at a bipartisan solution signals the fact that what is good for America is good healthcare policy, not political prowess over rivals. Governing from the fringe is not sustainable in a democracy. ...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


RISE West 2017 

Featuring three pre-conference workshops, and five tracks covering 20+ in-depth session topics, this event is an extraordinary value-proposition you don’t want to miss. Hear from industry thought leaders, as well as health plan and provider group experts who will share practical insights and updated lessons learned from the trenches on critical topics in risk adjustment, quality improvement, data management, coding compliance & more!


Upcoming Webinar

The Encounter Management Best Practices Playbook

What encounter best practices can managed care plans put into place to help them manage the pace of change in formats, rules and regulations? What do managed care plans have to stop doing if they want to ensure business continuity with their encounter operations in the face of change and bleeding revenue? What can you do to make sure your plan isn’t one of the ones that figured these things out too late? Join us to get answers to these questions and more on September 12th.


Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.