EMR Integration and Interoperability: The Need is Now

You don’t need special glasses to see that yesterday’s big focus on EMR data entry has been eclipsed by today’s quest for EMR integration and interoperability to bring together and share disparate types of healthcare data from multiple systems. The need is now, given that Meaningful Use is in the rear-view mirror for most and the value-based payment challenges of MACRA, MIPS, and APM initiatives are either underway already or on the immediate horizon.

Fee-for-Service models are quickly giving way to new value-over-volume models where providers and ACOs are taking on greater risk in hopes of seeking greater rewards. The pillars of meaningful use – care coordination, patient engagement, and information exchange – remain part of the evolving landscape. New MACRA requirements are creating the need for more data review, exchange, and reporting from more savvy EMR users in more sophisticated EMR systems.

Navigating the MACRA requirements and assuming and managing increased risk sharing necessitate having meaningful data presented at the point of care; data that alert care providers about suspected conditions and support treating verified conditions. Today, providers are inundated with data and messaging not just from other care providers, but from patient portals and personal health records (PHRs). EMR integration with non-traditional sources, such as PHRs, health plan claims data, biometric devices, wearable tech, and other medical devices, has huge potential in identifying suspected medical conditions and pre-disease dispositions. Such data can better inform treatment regimens, but only if coupled with tools that can mine years of data in a longitudinal EMR record and present the data directly within the provider’s workflow.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, integration and interoperability capabilities of EMR systems were further down on the list of “must have” functionalities when CIOs and other stakeholders were evaluating vendor systems. In the last five years, as the race to replace EMR systems has become the norm, both integration and interoperability are top-of-mind during vendor selection and evaluation.

Whereas integration and interoperability options in prior decades were largely limited to interface engines that needed dedicated IT staff and extensive customization, the last seven years have seen many new and existing companies offering middleware and cloud-based integration as service solutions. This myriad of options has given rise to an alphabet soup of data transfer standards (C-CDA®, FHIR®, HL7® Version 2.x, X12, and others) that seek to help deliver secure clinical information from multiple, disparate data sources. Understanding the processes for normalizing and vetting the data before they are accepted into an EMR system is key.

As advances in medicine and treatment progress, care providers need more sophisticated data analysis that is aggregated and presented to them in their workflow to better inform them about complex disease conditions and treatments. More and better data, delivered conveniently and expeditiously to the point of care – that is the promise of EMR integration and interoperability!

© 2017 Pulse8 Inc. Confidential and Proprietary. All Rights Reserved. For more information, please visit www.Pulse8.com or call (410) 928-4218


Categories: EMR, interoperability
Tags: interoperability, EMR

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

LA Care CEO Statement on the Graham-Cassidy Health Care Bill

L.A. Care is strongly opposed to the Graham-Cassidy health care bill, which is worse for L.A. Care members – and all of California – than the Repeal and Replace bill passed by the House in May and the bill that was defeated in the Senate in August. What is it?* The Graham-Cassidy bill is a last ditch effort by several Republican Senators that lumps Medicaid and the subsidies for the Exchange into block grants in 2020, leaving it to the states to decide how to allocate funding between Medicaid and the Exchange. It moves the funding formula for the block grants to a method that penalizes the states that expanded Medicaid, like California. Due to these changes, the Medicaid expansion population would be essentially eliminated by 2027. It also eliminates the mandate for individuals to have health insurance – a move that could destabilize the Exchange. This bill will fundamentally alter the federal/state partnership that has been in place since Medicaid’s inception since 1965. These changes will not only impact those who gained coverage through Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but also for mothers, children, developmentally disabled and elderly in nursing homes – all who have limited incomes. According to a recent Avelere study, California would be the hardest hit under this proposal, with a reduction in federal funding between $50 billion to $78 billion by 2027....
Read More

MACRA Mini Series Overview: Part 1 of 4

Spurred by the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, the healthcare industry is in the midst of an unprecedented transformation. The ACA was passed in an effort to increase access to health insurance and healthcare, while simultaneously improving the quality of healthcare and slowing the growth of healthcare costs.i President Donald Trump has made continued healthcare reform an immediate focus of his presidency, leaving the future of the ACA uncertain. While the future of the law is unknown, it is unlikely the pace of healthcare transformation will slow because reform efforts like the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) are expected to move forward as planned.ii MACRA represents the most sweeping change to physician payment for Medicare services in over two decades. With Medicare accounting for $618.7 billion, or 20 percent of national health expenditures, MACRA is guaranteed to have a substantial and immediate impact on both hospitals and physicians.iii In reacting to the implementation of MACRA’s Quality Payment Program (QPP), physicians will need to examine their existing organizational structure, evaluating their relationships with hospital partners. This five part article series examines how MACRA functions as a driving force for the evolving hospital-physician relationship. Part 1 provides an overview of the legislation and Part 2 explores the strategic implications of the legislation, while Part 3 looks at what the legislation may mean for hospital-physician alignment. Part 4 examines the legislation’s financial implications and Part 5 will wrap things up, providing you with some next steps for your organization. ...
Read More

Upcoming Conference


The Risk Adjustment Forum: Operational Integration and Compliance 

This is your can't-miss opportunity to gain proven strategies for enhancing the compliance of your coding and risk adjustment data. You also will get unparalleled insight and tools to help streamline the integration of risk adjustment and quality initiatives, and take away critical lessons learned from plans breaking down operational silos. You will also hear directly from CMS! 


Upcoming Webinar

Walking the Line: Balancing Claims, Premiums, and Compliance for Medicare Advantage Plans

Medicare Advantage plans walk a tight line when paying claims, managing premiums, and monitoring compliance demands. On one hand, they must ensure they receive the right premiums from CMS and pay claims correctly to cover the cost of care for their membership. On the other hand, CMS needs to ensure plans spend premiums responsibly in accordance with regulations. Medicare Advantage Plans must carefully consider the intertwining dependencies within their plans and with CMS, which can impact their ability to maximize the bottom line while managing compliance.


Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.