Following Up on the 2016 CMS Advance Notice

Mintz Levin Alerts MA Organizations About Fraud Risks 

In the article written by Tara Swenson of Mintz Levin and published in the National Law Review recently, there are some worthwhile points to note.  First, CMS is now viewing the population of Medicare Advantage members as being no different than those beneficiaries in Original FFS Medicare, on the whole.  Therefore, the logic goes, the aggregate payment level show be equivalent to the "old school" AAPCC model used before the year 2000 (BIPA era, for the old schoolers).  

Second, CMS has moved to establish two critical pieces of policy regarding in-home assessments in order to tackle potential abuse on the part of MAOs that might try to solely mine for revenue without taking care of the healthcare conditions they might uncover in the visit.  One piece is the publication of the CDC model health risk assessment form as the recommended model for 2016.  The other piece is the publication of "best practices" in terms of follow-up treatnment, evaluation, management or consideration that affects the providers' care of the patient.  With these two tools, CMS hopes to drive monitoring, tracking and reporting to evaluate the legitimacy of the in-home program.  

Finally, Ms. Swenson goes on to suggest a linkage to the Department of Justice, FBI and OIG action against a capitated physician in Florida who allegedly "upcoded" diagnoses in order to boost his financial take home for patients under contract from a Medicare Advantage plan.  

It is worthwhile to read, digest and ponder the warnings that Ms. Swenson posted in this article.  The critical questions will have to be answered by every MAO: 

  1. Are the diagnoses we are capturing and reporting going to pass the validation test by CMS standards?  This includes not only actions by the MAO itself but those taken on behalf of the MAO (e.g., providers and vendors) 
  2. Do we have the mechanisms in place to monitor, report and track the in-home cases, as required, and their logical extensions into follow-up in the doctors' offices?  Will those charts reflect documentation that substantiates the diagnoses captured and reported as would be the case in a RADV audit? 
  3. In the process, are we also "looking both ways" and deleting diagnoses that do not validate and meet the threshold established?  
  4. Overall, what are we doing to ensure that our providers know how to properly document in order for proper validation to take place? 

http://www.mintz.com/newsletter/2014/Advisories/4479-1214-NAT-HL-MLS/

 


Categories: Risk Adjustment
Tags: advance notice, CMS, OIG, RADV

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

It’s not Obamacare anymore. It’s our national health-care system.

By Drew Altman and Larry Levitt July 29 Drew Altman is president and chief executive of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Larry Levitt is senior vice president of the Kaiser Foundation. Republicans failed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act early Friday because of divisions within their own ranks, and because they tried not only to repeal and replace the ACA but also to cut and cap the Medicaid program, generating opposition from many red-state governors and their senators. But most of all, they failed because they built their various plans on the false claim — busted by the Congressional Budget Office — that they could maintain the same coverage levels as the ACA and lower premiums and deductibles, while at the same time slashing about a trillion dollars from Medicaid and ACA subsidies and softening the ACA’s consumer protection regulations. Had they succeeded, they would have won a big short-term victory with their base, which strongly supports repeal, but suffered the consequences in subsequent elections as the same voters lost coverage or were hit with higher premiums and deductibles. ...
Read More

Where to Now? True North Again

By Kevin Mowll, Executive Director of the RISE Association The failure of the Republicans to repeal, replace, or wreck ObamaCare is a wakeup call for everyone, not just Republicans. While the RISE Association steers away from purely political commentary, the lesson of this protracted political mess needs to be called out for the sake of putting our priorities straight around public policy regarding healthcare reform. In the attached Wall Street Journal article, which suggests that bipartisan solutions are the only remaining way forward, the author proffers hope that the blistering truth will be obvious to all the participants in the 7-year-long fracas around repeal and replace. The bloodied players may still brood in frustration that their political wills were not enough to win, but the author wonders if cooler heads will prevail. I, for one, am not so sanguine; yet I can only hope. https://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-search-for-answers-can-they-find-any-across-the-aisle-1501259286 The lesson I take away from the many years of wrangling is that the ObamaCare political football games demonstrates that political wills are not the way forward. They lose sight of the True North issue at hand. Rather, the failures of both political parties in arriving at a bipartisan solution signals the fact that what is good for America is good healthcare policy, not political prowess over rivals. Governing from the fringe is not sustainable in a democracy. ...
Read More

Upcoming Conference

 

RISE West 2017 

Featuring three pre-conference workshops, and five tracks covering 20+ in-depth session topics, this event is an extraordinary value-proposition you don’t want to miss. Hear from industry thought leaders, as well as health plan and provider group experts who will share practical insights and updated lessons learned from the trenches on critical topics in risk adjustment, quality improvement, data management, coding compliance & more!

More

Upcoming Webinar

The Encounter Management Best Practices Playbook

What encounter best practices can managed care plans put into place to help them manage the pace of change in formats, rules and regulations? What do managed care plans have to stop doing if they want to ensure business continuity with their encounter operations in the face of change and bleeding revenue? What can you do to make sure your plan isn’t one of the ones that figured these things out too late? Join us to get answers to these questions and more on September 12th.

 

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.