RAPS / EDS User Group Report

What impact will come with the migration from a RAPS-based RAF score to an encounter data-based RAF score? 

 

The RISE User Group aims to find out the answer to this question.  It involves complexity that is difficult to appreciate until you dig in deeper.  There are a lot of variables that cause different healthplans to come to different conclusions.  Here are some of the key moving parts:

  1. RAPS uses only 5 data elements to qualify for acceptable data submission while EDPS is aligned with the 5010 claim form of 37 data elements, which presents a lot more hurdles to pass for getting acceptance. 
  2. RAPS excludes a lot of services as ineligible for inclusion (such as labs, skilled nursing, etc.) while EDPS takes it all in. RAPS allows for supplemental data submissions to beef up its comprehensiveness and accuracy. In contrast, EDPS is primarily encounter-based (or claims- based), but EDPS allows retrospective and prospective chart reviews to augment the data from claims. 
  3. Depending on the filtering logic employed by the healthplans for both approaches, there can be a wide divergence in the percentage of diagnoses accepted

In addition to all these variables, we share further challenges getting adequate diagnoses captured.  When you take an end-to-end process review, there are several places where robust diagnosis capture gets watered down.  “Think of this as a hose”, as Behzad Mohazzebi1 famously said, “and let’s count the leaks”. Some examples:

  • The provider office billing systems, complying with the 5010, can only accept 12 ICD codes
  • The 837 submission abides by this restriction and, in order to gain a full set of diagnoses for truly complex patients, multiple 837s would be required.  However, that sets up claims processing duplicate flags at the payers’ end and would also require some special programming when submitting more than 12 ICD codes to EDPS as plans would be required to LINK claims together.
  • The handoff to billing services often result in truncating diagnoses, as do clearinghouses and other intermediate hands in the process
  • Hospital billing systems can often truncate the rich set of diagnoses that their coders extract from medical records
  • The claims systems at healthplans and insurance companies also have been found to frequently drop diagnoses because they are old systems that were not designed to accept a large number of diagnostic codes

The User Group hopes to begin tracking and reporting as testing of EDS submissions progresses.  We are expecting to gauge the level of data rejection, the types of filtering logic pursued by the plans, and root causes discovered in the process.  We are publishing a worksheet that is being used as the initial data collection tool for any RISE members to view.  Whatever we find as we work on this, we plan to publish and share in a transparent manner.  All Medicare Advantage Organizations are invited to join the group.  However, it may also be of interest to those with ACA-Marketplace products, since that will be entirely an encounter-based risk adjustment program.  

Download the Excel Spreadsheet we are using for data collection:  click here to download first page  second page  third page

 

1 Behzad Mohazzebi, founder of DCA, now part of Altegra Health


Categories: Risk Adjustment
Tags: RAPS, EDS

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

It’s not Obamacare anymore. It’s our national health-care system.

By Drew Altman and Larry Levitt July 29 Drew Altman is president and chief executive of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Larry Levitt is senior vice president of the Kaiser Foundation. Republicans failed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act early Friday because of divisions within their own ranks, and because they tried not only to repeal and replace the ACA but also to cut and cap the Medicaid program, generating opposition from many red-state governors and their senators. But most of all, they failed because they built their various plans on the false claim — busted by the Congressional Budget Office — that they could maintain the same coverage levels as the ACA and lower premiums and deductibles, while at the same time slashing about a trillion dollars from Medicaid and ACA subsidies and softening the ACA’s consumer protection regulations. Had they succeeded, they would have won a big short-term victory with their base, which strongly supports repeal, but suffered the consequences in subsequent elections as the same voters lost coverage or were hit with higher premiums and deductibles. ...
Read More

Where to Now? True North Again

By Kevin Mowll, Executive Director of the RISE Association The failure of the Republicans to repeal, replace, or wreck ObamaCare is a wakeup call for everyone, not just Republicans. While the RISE Association steers away from purely political commentary, the lesson of this protracted political mess needs to be called out for the sake of putting our priorities straight around public policy regarding healthcare reform. In the attached Wall Street Journal article, which suggests that bipartisan solutions are the only remaining way forward, the author proffers hope that the blistering truth will be obvious to all the participants in the 7-year-long fracas around repeal and replace. The bloodied players may still brood in frustration that their political wills were not enough to win, but the author wonders if cooler heads will prevail. I, for one, am not so sanguine; yet I can only hope. https://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-search-for-answers-can-they-find-any-across-the-aisle-1501259286 The lesson I take away from the many years of wrangling is that the ObamaCare political football games demonstrates that political wills are not the way forward. They lose sight of the True North issue at hand. Rather, the failures of both political parties in arriving at a bipartisan solution signals the fact that what is good for America is good healthcare policy, not political prowess over rivals. Governing from the fringe is not sustainable in a democracy. ...
Read More

Upcoming Conference

 

RISE West 2017 

Featuring three pre-conference workshops, and five tracks covering 20+ in-depth session topics, this event is an extraordinary value-proposition you don’t want to miss. Hear from industry thought leaders, as well as health plan and provider group experts who will share practical insights and updated lessons learned from the trenches on critical topics in risk adjustment, quality improvement, data management, coding compliance & more!

More

Upcoming Webinar

The Encounter Management Best Practices Playbook

What encounter best practices can managed care plans put into place to help them manage the pace of change in formats, rules and regulations? What do managed care plans have to stop doing if they want to ensure business continuity with their encounter operations in the face of change and bleeding revenue? What can you do to make sure your plan isn’t one of the ones that figured these things out too late? Join us to get answers to these questions and more on September 12th.

 

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.