Why Does Risk Adjustment Need Technology?

Technology Risk Adj

Cognitive computing. Machine learning. Natural language processing.

Two years ago, few people in the risk adjustment world had ever heard of these terms, and yet today they are becoming synonymous with risk adjustment. What are these technologies? Why do we even need them in risk adjustment?

Traditional risk adjustment just isn’t efficient

Traditionally, risk adjustment has been done manually: Coders comb through thousands of pages of patient charts and look for documented chronic conditions. But this isn’t the most effective or efficient process. It is time consuming and costly, and it doesn’t make good use of coders’ expertise. When I coded this way, It was frustrating that I had to spend so much time organizing my work before I could actually start doing it. Additionally, coders are often beholden to the slow and disruptive chart retrieval process.

Manual risk adjustment is also difficult for coder managers. With a manual process, it’s tough to QA 100% of documents, because there are just too many to review and not enough time to do it. And without electronic oversight, it’s difficult to have more than anecdotal insight into how your risk adjustment process is performing overall and identify ways to improve as an organization. This is critical from a management perspective if they need to manage their coders and other resources effectively. 

Providers and payers face special challenges here. Providers may not receive or have access to all their patient’s health information, which leads to missing critical information in the medical decision making process. For payers, in order to get charts, they have to bother providers, creating a big disruption in the providers’ workday and unnecessary friction that will affect their relationship.

Risk adjustment will get bigger and the stakes will increase

All of this would be concerning in an ordinary moment, but we are in an extraordinary one. Currently, only five percent of Medicare Advantage plans are audited every year, and whatever money is recouped from the audit sample is not extrapolated to all the plan’s charts. CMS is considering audit changes in 2017 that would entail 100% of plans being audited and audit findings being extrapolated to all charts. Given this, and the fact that Medicare Advantage enrollment is increasing by about a million patients a year, we can hardly afford for risk adjustment to continue to be this difficult and time consuming.

Risk adjustment is ripe for a technological revolution

In the past decade, technology has made our lives easier in many ways. Take, for example, shopping. Just a couple years ago, shopping for a household meant driving around to four different stores in your area. You might go to Kohl’s to get a couple shirts for yourself, Sports Authority to pick up sneakers for your kids, the hardware store to get a can of paint, and finally the grocery store for dinner ingredients. Now, if you choose, you can buy all these things in a couple clicks, from the comfort of your home, with Amazon, while easily comparing price, specs, and even reviews. Think about what a huge transformation that is: We went from physically collecting objects at stores, to clicking on pictures of objects and then getting them delivered to your door. Technology has fundamentally improved the experience.

Just like Amazon has done for shopping, technology is improving the risk adjustment process. It has made risk adjustment coding more productive, accurate, efficient, transparent, and predictive.

Submitted by Apixio


Categories: Risk Adjustment
Tags: risk adjustment, technology

Log on to Your Rise Account

Forgot your password?
Create an Account

Association Sponsors

Latest Posts

It’s not Obamacare anymore. It’s our national health-care system.

By Drew Altman and Larry Levitt July 29 Drew Altman is president and chief executive of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Larry Levitt is senior vice president of the Kaiser Foundation. Republicans failed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act early Friday because of divisions within their own ranks, and because they tried not only to repeal and replace the ACA but also to cut and cap the Medicaid program, generating opposition from many red-state governors and their senators. But most of all, they failed because they built their various plans on the false claim — busted by the Congressional Budget Office — that they could maintain the same coverage levels as the ACA and lower premiums and deductibles, while at the same time slashing about a trillion dollars from Medicaid and ACA subsidies and softening the ACA’s consumer protection regulations. Had they succeeded, they would have won a big short-term victory with their base, which strongly supports repeal, but suffered the consequences in subsequent elections as the same voters lost coverage or were hit with higher premiums and deductibles. ...
Read More

Where to Now? True North Again

By Kevin Mowll, Executive Director of the RISE Association The failure of the Republicans to repeal, replace, or wreck ObamaCare is a wakeup call for everyone, not just Republicans. While the RISE Association steers away from purely political commentary, the lesson of this protracted political mess needs to be called out for the sake of putting our priorities straight around public policy regarding healthcare reform. In the attached Wall Street Journal article, which suggests that bipartisan solutions are the only remaining way forward, the author proffers hope that the blistering truth will be obvious to all the participants in the 7-year-long fracas around repeal and replace. The bloodied players may still brood in frustration that their political wills were not enough to win, but the author wonders if cooler heads will prevail. I, for one, am not so sanguine; yet I can only hope. https://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-search-for-answers-can-they-find-any-across-the-aisle-1501259286 The lesson I take away from the many years of wrangling is that the ObamaCare political football games demonstrates that political wills are not the way forward. They lose sight of the True North issue at hand. Rather, the failures of both political parties in arriving at a bipartisan solution signals the fact that what is good for America is good healthcare policy, not political prowess over rivals. Governing from the fringe is not sustainable in a democracy. ...
Read More

Upcoming Conference

 

RISE West 2017 

Featuring three pre-conference workshops, and five tracks covering 20+ in-depth session topics, this event is an extraordinary value-proposition you don’t want to miss. Hear from industry thought leaders, as well as health plan and provider group experts who will share practical insights and updated lessons learned from the trenches on critical topics in risk adjustment, quality improvement, data management, coding compliance & more!

More

Upcoming Webinar

The Encounter Management Best Practices Playbook

What encounter best practices can managed care plans put into place to help them manage the pace of change in formats, rules and regulations? What do managed care plans have to stop doing if they want to ensure business continuity with their encounter operations in the face of change and bleeding revenue? What can you do to make sure your plan isn’t one of the ones that figured these things out too late? Join us to get answers to these questions and more on September 12th.

 

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2014 Resource Initiative & Society for Education. All rights reserved.